Radiometric dating vs carbon dating

These changes typically occur so slowly that they are barely detectable over the span of a human life, yet even at this instant, the Earth's surface is moving and changing.

As these changes have occurred, organisms have evolved, and remnants of some have been preserved as fossils.

Carbon 14 is used for this example:, which was put out by Dr. is presently only 1/3 of the way to an equilibrium value which will be reached in 30,000 years. Knowing how faulty creationist "facts" can be, let's do a little research of our own.

They are then able to calibrate the carbon dating method to produce fairly accurate results.

Carbon dating is thus accurate within the timeframe set by other archaeological dating techniques.

Along the way, we'll learn how stratigraphic succession and radioactive decay contribute to the work of paleontologists.

Consider the following scenario: Paul the Paleontologist is a very famous scientist who has studied dinosaur bones all over the world.

Leave a Reply